Contents

1. Introduction to MiFID

The European Financial Instruments Markets Directive (MiFID) is a legal framework established by the European Union to regulate the operation of financial markets, protect investors and promote market transparency. MiFID was first promulgated in 2004 (MiFID I) and revised to MiFID II in 2014. Together with its supporting regulation, the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR), it officially came into effect on January 2018, 1. The following is a detailed introduction to MiFID, covering its background, purpose, main contents, scope of application and impact:

1. Background and purpose of MiFID

MiFID is part of the EU's financial market integration plan and aims to replace the 1993 Investment Services Directive (ISD) to adapt to the increasingly complex financial market environment. Its main purposes are to:
  1. Promote market integration: Promote cross-border financial services and competition by unifying the financial market regulatory rules of EU member states.
  2. Protecting investors: Raise investor protection standards and ensure financial institutions act in the best interests of their clients.
  3. Improving market transparency:Standardize transaction execution and reporting to reduce market manipulation and unfair behavior.
  4. Enhance market efficiency:Encourage innovation of financial instruments and trading platforms to reduce transaction costs.
MiFID II/MiFIR further expands on these objectives, strengthening regulatory requirements in response to shortcomings of MiFID I (such as those exposed by the 2008 financial crisis), particularly in the areas of derivatives markets, algorithmic trading and transparency of non-equity assets.

2. Scope of application of MiFID

MiFID applies to financial institutions that provide investment services or conduct investment activities in EU member states (including EEA member states), mainly including:
  • Financial institution:Banks, investment companies, securities companies, asset management companies, etc.
  • Financial tool: Covers stocks, bonds, derivatives (futures, options, swaps, etc.), structured products, fund shares, etc.
  • Trading venue: Includes regulated markets (RM), multilateral trading facilities (MTF), organized trading facilities (OTF) and systematic internal matching (SI).
MiFID also applies to non-EU financial institutions operating within the EU (“third country firms”) and they are subject to specific requirements if they provide investment services to EU clients.

II. Basic conditions for applying for a MiFID license

  • Legal entity establishment :

    • Applicants must be registered as a legal entity (such as a limited company) in an EU member state.
    • The entity must have a clear business scope and focus on investment services or activities specified in MiFID (such as securities trading, investment advice, asset management, etc.).

  • Clear business scope :

    • Applicants are required to submit a detailed business plan clearly stating the types of investment services and financial instruments to be provided. Investment services regulated by MiFID include:
      • Accept and deliver customer orders.
      • Execute customer orders.
      • Proprietary trading.
      • Portfolio management.
      • Investment advice.
      • Underwriting or placing financial instruments.
    • The business plan should also describe the target market, customer type (retail, professional or qualified counterparty) and operating model.

  • Minimum capital requirements :

    • MiFID II sets different minimum capital requirements depending on the type of services provided by the institution and the risk exposure, as follows:
      • €50,000: Applicable to institutions that do not hold client funds or securities and only provide order routing or investment advice.
      • €125,000: Applicable to institutions that hold client funds or securities, or engage in proprietary trading.
      • €730,000: Applicable to institutions engaged in high-risk activities (such as systematic internal matching or large-scale proprietary trading).
    • Institutions are required to demonstrate that they are adequately capitalized and submit audited financial statements.

  • Governance structure and organizational requirements :

    • Corporate Governance:A clear organizational structure needs to be established, including a board of directors, a supervisory board (if applicable) and senior management.
    • Risk Management: Establish an independent risk management department to formulate and implement risk control policies covering market risk, operational risk and credit risk, etc.
    • Compliance Department: Establish a compliance department to ensure compliance with MiFID II’s transparency, reporting and investor protection requirements.
    • Internal Audit: In some cases, it is necessary to establish an independent internal audit function to regularly evaluate the effectiveness of internal controls.

  • Personnel Qualification and Suitability :

    • senior management:Directors and senior management must have sufficient professional knowledge, skills and experience (usually more than 5 years of experience in finance or related fields) and pass the regulator's "Fit and Proper" assessment.
    • Key position employees:Traders, compliance officers, risk managers, etc. need to have relevant qualifications or prove their professional capabilities.
    • background check: All senior managers are subject to background checks to ensure they have no criminal record or major violations.

  • Technical and operational capabilities :

    • Trading System: Applicants need to demonstrate that their trading systems are robust and can handle order execution, data recording and reporting requirements, especially high-frequency trading or algorithmic trading.
    • Data report: Must have the ability to submit transaction reports to regulators and comply with MiFID II's pre- and post-trade transparency requirements.
    • cyber security: Ensure that the system has adequate cybersecurity measures to prevent data leakage or system failure.
    • record keeping: You must be able to keep all communication records related to investment services (including phone calls, emails, etc.), which are usually kept for 5 to 7 years.

  • Investor Protection Measures :

    • Applicants will need to demonstrate compliance with MiFID II’s investor protection requirements, including:
      • Customer classification (retail, professional, eligible counterparties) and their corresponding protection measures.
      • Suitability and suitability assessment process.
      • Best execution policy ensures that customer orders are executed under the best conditions.
      • Conflict of interest management policy to prevent commission inducement or other improper behavior.
    • Submit product governance plans to ensure that financial product design and distribution meet the needs of the target market.

  • Anti-Money Laundering and Compliance :

    • Applicants are required to develop and implement an Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Terrorist Financing (CTF) policy in compliance with the EU Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD).
    • It is necessary to conduct customer due diligence (KYC) and ensure monitoring and reporting mechanisms for suspicious transactions.

III. Application Process

  • Choosing a Regulatory Authority :

    • Applicants are required to choose a regulatory authority in an EU member state to submit their application. The choice is usually based on the location of the business, the regulatory environment or cost (e.g. Cyprus, Malta etc. are popular due to their lower costs).
    • Common regulatory agencies include:
      • Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
      • German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin)
      • Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC)
      • Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA)

  • Prepare application materials :

    • Applicants are required to submit the following documents (specific requirements vary by regulatory body):
      • Certificate of Incorporation and Articles of Incorporation.
      • Detailed business plan (including market analysis, financial forecasts and risk management strategy).
      • Proof of capital adequacy (bank deposit certificate or audited financial statements).
      • Resumes, qualifications and background check materials of senior management and key employees.
      • Risk management, compliance and internal control policies.
      • Description of technical systems (including trading platforms, data reporting and network security measures).
      • Investor protection measures and product governance plans.
      • Anti-Money Laundering and KYC policies.
    • All documents must be translated into the language required by the regulatory body (e.g. English or local language).

  • Submit application :

    • Submit your application through the regulator’s online platform or in paper form.
    • Pay the application fee (fees vary from country to country, usually from several thousand to tens of thousands of Euros).

  • review process :

    • The regulatory authorities typically complete their review within 3 to 6 months (depending on the complexity of the application and the efficiency of the regulatory authorities).
    • During the review, the regulator may request additional materials or conduct an interview.
    • Some regulators (such as the FCA) may require an on-site inspection to ensure the applicant's operational readiness.

  • Obtaining a license :

    • If the application is approved, the regulator will issue a MiFID license, allowing the applicant to provide investment services in the country.
    • License holders can provide services to other EEA member states through "passporting" without the need for additional application.

IV. Supervision and Continuous Compliance of MiFID License

1. investor protection

  • Customer Classification :
    • Continue to classify clients as retail clients, professional clients or eligible counterparties and provide different levels of protection based on their classification.
    • The accuracy of client classification needs to be reviewed regularly, particularly if the client's financial situation or investment objectives change.
  • Suitability and fitness assessment :
    • When providing non-advisory services, assess whether the client’s knowledge and experience are appropriate for the specific financial instrument (suitability).
    • When providing investment advice or asset management, ensure that the advice is consistent with the client’s financial situation, investment objectives and risk tolerance (suitability).
    • Relevant assessment records must be kept for review by regulatory authorities.
  • Best Execution :
    • Develop and implement best execution policies to ensure that client orders are filled at the best price, speed and execution possibility.
    • Regularly (at least annually) review the effectiveness of the execution policy and disclose execution quality reports to clients.
  • Conflict of Interest Management :
    • Identify and manage potential conflicts of interest (e.g., commission incentives or proprietary trading versus client interests).
    • Disclose unavoidable conflicts of interest and take steps to mitigate their impact.
    • MiFID II prohibits accepting commissions from third parties in certain circumstances (e.g. for independent investment advice), ensuring that fee structures are transparent.
  • Product Governance :
    • Ensure that the financial products designed and distributed meet the needs of customers in the target market and review product performance regularly.
    • Share target market information with product distributors and monitor distribution channels for compliance.
  • Information disclosure :
    • Provide customers with clear, fair and not misleading information, including fees, risks, product features and terms of service.
    • Providing regular reporting (e.g. on portfolio performance or transaction costs) to ensure clients understand the status of their investments.

2. Market transparency and reporting

  • Pre-trade transparency :
    • Publicly available bid and ask quotes and order book data on a regulated market (RM), multilateral trading facility (MTF) or organised trading facility (OTF).
    • Systematic internal matching (SI) agencies are required to make their quotes public, especially for equities and derivatives.
  • Post-trade transparency :
    • All transactions (including over-the-counter transactions, OTC) must be reported to the Approved Publication Arrangement (APA) or regulatory authority within a reasonable time.
    • The report includes transaction time, price, quantity, counterparty and financial instrument identification number (such as ISIN).
  • Transaction Report :
    • Submit detailed transaction reports to the regulator covering transactions in all MiFID financial instruments.
    • The report must be submitted within T+1 day after the end of the trading day and the format must comply with ESMA's technical standards.
  • Reference Data :
    • Submit reference data of financial instruments (such as ISIN code, trading venue code) to ensure data consistency and traceability.
  • Data quality :
    • Ensure accuracy and completeness of reported data and implement internal data validation processes.
    • If any errors are found, they must be corrected promptly and the regulatory authorities notified.

3. Trading venues and market structure

  • Operational Compliance :
    • If an institution operates an RM, MTF or OTF, it must comply with specific operational and transparency rules, such as fair trading principles and system robustness requirements.
    • OTF operators need to ensure that their discretionary power complies with regulatory guidelines.
  • Systematic Internal Matching (SI) :
    • If an institution meets the SI threshold (i.e. frequently trades with clients on its own account), it must register as an SI and comply with quotation and reporting requirements.
    • Regularly assess whether SI qualifications are met and report to the regulatory authority.
  • Over-the-Counter (OTC) :
    • Implement stricter reporting and transparency requirements for OTC transactions to reduce the risk of unreported transactions.

4. Derivatives Market Regulation

  • Compulsory Liquidation :
    • Certain standardized over-the-counter derivatives need to be cleared through a central clearing house (CCP), and institutions need to establish a connection with the CCP and comply with clearing rules.
  • Trading obligations :
    • Certain derivatives must be traded on RM, MTF or OTF, and institutions must ensure that the trading venues are compliant.
  • Risk Management :
    • Implement risk management measures for derivatives trading, such as margin requirements and position limits.

5. Algorithmic Trading and High Frequency Trading (HFT)

  • System robustness :
    • Ensure that algorithmic trading systems have sufficient robustness and risk controls to prevent system failures or market disruptions.
    • Implement stress testing and business continuity plans.
  • regulatory requirements :
    • Institutions engaging in high-frequency trading are subject to specific licensing and additional reporting requirements (such as order book data).
    • Maintain detailed records of all algorithmic trading, including order submissions and cancellations.
  • Market Abuse Prevention :
    • Monitor trading behavior to prevent order book manipulation, quote stuffing, or other market abuse.

6. Anti-Money Laundering and Compliance

  • Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Terrorist Financing (CTF) :
    • Conduct customer due diligence (KYC) to verify customer identities and assess their risk level.
    • Monitor suspicious transactions and report them to regulators in compliance with the EU Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD).
  • Compliance Monitoring :
    • Establish a compliance officer to oversee MiFID compliance and liaise with regulators.
    • Train employees regularly to ensure familiarity with regulatory requirements and internal policies.

7. record keeping

  • Maintain all records related to investment services, including:
    • Customer communications (phone, email, instant messaging, etc.).
    • Trading data (orders, execution records, reports).
    • Suitability and appropriateness assessment.
    • Conflict of interest management measures.
  • Shelf life is typically 5 to 7 years, depending on regulatory agency requirements.
  • Records need to be readily available for inspection by regulatory authorities and stored in an electronic format for rapid retrieval.

8. Capital and Financial Requirements

  • Adequate capital :
    • Continue to meet minimum capital requirements and adjust capital levels based on business size and risk exposure.
    • Regular capital stress testing is performed to ensure that operations can be maintained during market fluctuations or operational difficulties.
  • Financial reporting :
    • Submit audited financial statements to regulatory authorities, usually as annual reports.
    • If there are any significant financial changes (such as capital reduction), the regulatory authorities must be notified in a timely manner.

9. Internal Governance and Audit

  • governance structure :
    • Maintain effective corporate governance, including separation of board oversight, risk management and compliance functions.
    • Regularly review governance policies to ensure they remain relevant to business and regulatory changes.
  • Internal Audit :
    • Implement internal audit programs to evaluate the effectiveness of risk management and compliance measures.
    • Engage external auditors to conduct independent audits, particularly in the areas of transaction reporting and financial compliance.

5. Actual Cases

Case 1: Aisa International (OpesFidelio Network)’s MiFID Securities License Application

  • back ground:Aisa International, an investment advisory firm operating the OpesFidelio network, plans to provide independent and discretionary investment services within the European Economic Area (EEA), and has therefore applied for a MiFID securities license to enable flexible operations and access to other EEA countries through the "passport effect".

     
  • process :
    • expected: The company expects the application process to take 6-8 months, cost approximately €50,000 (excluding capital adequacy requirements), and require 3 key qualified employees.
    • actual:申請耗時18個月,成本達€100,000,需6名關鍵合格員工(2名合格董事、1名合規官、1名監事、1名投資經理和1名外部審計師),並承擔大量壓力。
    • challenge :
      • Regulatory requirements are onerous and include transparency rules, additional due diligence and investor protection measures.
      • An independent supervisory board and a sound governance structure need to be established.
      • Compared to the Insurance Distribution Directive (IDD), the MiFID securities licence has higher qualification requirements (e.g. NVQ Level 3 is not sufficient to meet MiFID standards).
    • Result: Despite the difficult process, the company successfully obtained the license, believing that this was the most challenging task in 25 years, but the license enhances investor trust and allows a more flexible service model (such as independent advice rather than being limited to its own funds).
  • Enlightenment:Application for a MiFID securities license requires sufficient preparation time, manpower and funds. Small and medium-sized institutions may underestimate the compliance burden, but the long-term value of the license (market access, customer trust) is significant.

     

Case 2: An anonymous investment company was fined for reporting violations

  • back ground:An EU MiFID licensed investment company (the specific name is not disclosed, the case comes from regulatory enforcement reports) was fined by the regulator for failing to submit transaction reports in a timely manner as required by MiFID II and violating post-trade transparency rules.
  • process :
    • In 2020, the company was found to have delayed submitting T+1 transaction reports (which should be submitted within 1 day after the trading day) several times, and some of the reported data was incomplete (such as missing prices and quantities).
    • After an off-site inspection, the regulator (assuming it is the Dutch AFM) requires the company to make corrections and submit a supplementary report.
    • The company admitted that its transaction reporting system had not been upgraded to the latest technical standards of MiFID II (such as XML format), resulting in data errors.
  • Result: The company was fined €150,000 and was given 3 months to upgrade its systems. The company ultimately invested €200,000 in a new reporting platform to avoid further penalties.
  • Enlightenment:MiFID II’s transaction reporting requirements have high technical thresholds, and institutions need to continue to invest in compliance systems, otherwise they may face heavy fines.

Case 3: Technological transformation of large banks in response to MiFID II (Nordea case)

  • back ground:Nordea Bank Abp, a major Nordic bank, as a MiFID licensee, needs to fully adapt to the regulatory requirements after MiFID II comes into effect in January 2018.

     
  • process :
    • Nordea has updated its Client Agreement and Terms of Service to comply with MiFID II’s investor protection requirements (e.g. distinction between independent and non-independent advice, commission splitting).
    • Invest in a new trade reporting system to ensure compliance with pre- and post-trade transparency requirements and support reporting of commodity derivatives positions (needing to identify whether clients are hedging or speculating).
    • To comply with the unbundling rules, Nordea enters into separate research service agreements with its clients, pricing research costs separately from execution costs.
  • challenge :
    • Client dissatisfaction with the new fee structure (research unbundling) requires additional communication and explanation.
    • Technology upgrades are costly, especially for reporting systems that support multiple asset classes (stocks, bonds, derivatives).
  • Result: Nordea successfully complies with MiFID II requirements, solidifying its compliant position in the EEA market and boosting trust through transparent client communications.
  • Enlightenment:Large institutions need to invest significant resources in technology and customer relationship management to meet the comprehensive requirements of MiFID II.

     

Case 4: Gemini Exchange obtains Malta MiFID investment company license

  • back ground: In May 2025, the crypto exchange Gemini announced that it had obtained an investment company license issued by the Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA). It plans to provide compliant perpetual contracts and other derivative trading services in the EU and EEA in accordance with MiFID II, covering both retail and institutional clients.
  • process :
    • Gemini applied for a MiFID investment firm license, focusing on crypto asset derivatives (such as perpetual contracts), which are considered MiFID II financial instruments.
    • As part of the application process, Gemini will need to demonstrate that its trading system complies with MiFID II’s transparency requirements (such as pre- and post-trade reporting) and implements strict KYC and anti-money laundering (AML) measures in accordance with AMLD5.
    • The Malta MFSA became Gemini’s preferred regulator due to its friendly regulatory environment towards crypto assets, such as supporting the MiCA transition.
  • challenge :
    • Ensure that derivatives transactions are conducted in regulated venues (MTF or OTF) and must be integrated with compliant trading platforms.
    • Meet MiFID II’s high standards of protection for retail clients (e.g. suitability assessment, risk disclosure).
    • Prepare for potential licensing requirements (such as CASP licensing) once MiCA comes into full effect.
  • Result:Gemini successfully obtained a license and plans to use the passport effect of MiFID II to expand derivatives services in the EEA market while preparing for MiCA compliance.
  • Enlightenment:The MiFID license provides a legal way for crypto exchanges to enter the EEA market, but it is necessary to balance technological investment and regulatory requirements. Regulatory-friendly countries such as Malta are the first choice.

Case 5: Neverless obtains MiFID license and provides investor protection

  • back ground: In May 2025, user X mentioned that the crypto platform Neverless obtained a MiFID license and provided investor compensation protection of €5, enhancing customers' confidence in the security of their funds.
  • process :
    • Neverless is applying for a MiFID license, presumably as an investment firm or MTF operator, focusing on crypto-asset related services (such as securitized token trading or investment advice).
    • License applications must meet MiFID II’s investor protection requirements, including participation in a member state’s investor compensation scheme (e.g. a €20,000 cap) to address potential bankruptcy or fraud risks.
    • The company emphasizes that funds do not stay on the platform for a long time, reducing customer risks and demonstrating its compliance with MiFID II customer asset protection rules.
  • challenge :
    • Ensure trading systems support MiFID II’s real-time reporting and transparency requirements.
    • Balancing high compliance costs with competitive pressures in the crypto market.
  • Result: After obtaining the license, Neverless improved market trust through investor compensation protection and attracted more customers.
  • Enlightenment: A MiFID license combined with an investor compensation scheme can significantly enhance the credibility of a crypto platform, but compliance costs will need to be managed on an ongoing basis.

Case 6: A crypto platform was investigated by regulators for illegal promotion

  • back ground: An anonymous MiFID licensed crypto platform (the case is based on regulatory enforcement trends and the specific name is not disclosed) was investigated by the regulator in 2023 for failing to comply with the promotion requirements of MiFID II.
  • process :
    • The platform promoted security tokens (which are MiFID II financial instruments) but failed to provide clear, fair and non-misleading information, in violation of MiFID II's investor protection rules.
    • The regulator (presumably the French AMF) found that its advertisements exaggerated the token’s return potential and lacked adequate risk disclosure.
    • The investigation found that the platform failed to conduct suitability assessments on retail clients and allowed unqualified clients to participate in high-risk investments.
  • Result: The platform was fined €80,000 and required to revise its promotional materials and customer evaluation processes. After the rectification, the platform invested in compliance training and automated KYC systems.
  • Enlightenment:MiFID II has strict regulations on the promotion of crypto assets, especially in the retail market. Institutions need to ensure advertising compliance and implement strict customer screening.

Case 7: Germany's BaFin's MiFID regulatory dispute over virtual currencies

  • back ground:The German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) once regarded virtual currencies such as Bitcoin as "units of account", included them in the scope of financial instruments of the German Banking Act (KWG), and required related services to apply for MiFID licenses. However, in 2018, the Berlin Higher Court ruled that Bitcoin was not a financial instrument and did not require KWG approval, which was contrary to BaFin's position.

     
  • process :
    • A German crypto exchange, whose name has not been made public, has applied for a MiFID license to provide bitcoin derivatives trading services, as required by BaFin.
    • During the application process, exchanges will need to demonstrate that they comply with MiFID II’s transparency, reporting and investor protection requirements, particularly mandatory clearing and trading obligations for derivatives.
    • After the court ruling, the exchange instead applied for a CASP license under MiCA, focusing on crypto asset services for non-financial instruments.
  • challenge :
    • Conflicting positions between regulators and courts lead to compliance uncertainty.
    • The high cost of a MiFID licence has prompted institutions to seek alternative licences (such as MiCA).
  • Result: The exchange eventually obtained a CASP license, avoiding the strict requirements of a MiFID license, but still needs to comply with AMLD5's anti-money laundering rules.
  • Enlightenment:Germany’s regulatory stance on virtual currencies is complex. The implementation of MiCA is expected to unify the regulation of non-financial instrument crypto assets and reduce the pressure on the application of MiFID licenses.

FAQs

Not all virtual currencies fall under MiFID II Financial Instruments. According to ESMA’s guidance, the regulatory classification of virtual currencies depends on their characteristics and functions:
  • If virtual currency meets the definition of financial instruments(such as transferable securities, money market instruments, derivatives), are subject to MiFID II. Supervision. For example, some asset-referenced tokens Tokens) or Tokenized Securities) may be considered transferable securities.

     
  • If it is not a financial instrument(such as most decentralized cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, utility tokens or non-fungible tokens (NFTs)) are usually regulated by MiCA rather than MiFID II.

     
  • Practical Challenges:The design, rights and functions of virtual currencies need to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis; the technical structure (such as blockchain) does not affect its classification.
Depends on the type of service:
  • Situations where a MiFID license is required: If the services involve financial instruments defined in MiFID II (such as trading in securitized tokens, investment advice or asset management), a MiFID license is required. For example, multilateral trading facilities (MTFs) operating securitized tokens will need to comply with MiFID II requirements.

     
  • Situations where a MiFID license is not required: Virtual currency services that only provide non-financial instruments (such as Bitcoin exchange for legal currency, custodial wallets) usually require an application for a Crypto Asset Service Provider (CASP) license under MiCA rather than a MiFID license.
  • Transitional Period: Before MiCA fully comes into effect, some virtual currency services may be regulated by the Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD) or local rules of member states.
  • Yes, MiFID license holders (such as investment firms) can notify the regulator through a "MiFID Top-Up" to expand their services to crypto assets without having to apply for a full MiCA license. Applicable services include:
    • Receive and transmit crypto-asset orders.
    • Provide crypto asset investment advice.
    • Manage crypto asset portfolios.
  • Claim:It is necessary to submit a notification to the regulator to demonstrate that existing MiFID compliance measures apply to crypto asset services and update relevant policies (such as risk management and customer protection).
    • PI License: Focus on payment services (such as transaction processing, remittances, PIS/AIS) and cannot issue electronic currency.
    • EMImississippi (Electronic Money Institution License, EMI): Allows the issuance of electronic money (such as prepaid cards, digital wallet balances) and provides all the services of PI.
    • If a PI licensee needs to issue electronic money, it must upgrade to an EMI license or cooperate with an EMI licensee.
  • Example: PingPong first obtained the Luxembourg PI license (2017) and later upgraded it to an EMI license (2020) to support e-money services.
  • MiFID II: Applies to crypto assets classified as financial instruments (such as security tokens), covering trading, investment services and investor protection.
  • Mica:Applies to crypto assets that are non-financial instruments (such as Bitcoin, utility tokens), regulating issuance, trading, custody and service providers (CASP).
  • complementarity: MiCA fills regulatory gaps not covered by MiFID II and avoids duplication. For example, MiCA does not apply to financial instruments regulated by MiFID II, nor does it cover crypto assets that are non-transferable or accepted only by issuers.

     
     
  • Instance:If an institution provides both security token (MiFID II) and Bitcoin (MiCA) services, it may need to hold both a MiFID license and a CASP license.
Germany's Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) once regarded virtual currencies such as Bitcoin as "units of account", included them in the scope of financial instruments of the German Banking Act (KWG), and required related services to apply for licenses. However, in 2018, the Berlin High Court ruled that Bitcoin is not a financial instrument and does not require KWG permission, which is contrary to BaFin's position. After MiCA comes into effect, Germany's non-financial instrument crypto assets will be regulated by MiCA, and BaFin still requires CASP license
  • The regulation of DeFi platforms depends on their functions:
    • If a DeFi platform provides trading or investment services for securitized tokens (such as automated market makers involving financial instruments), it may be regarded as a multilateral trading facility (MTF) or an organized trading facility (OTF) and require a MiFID license.
    • If only crypto assets that are not financial instruments are involved (such as Bitcoin and utility tokens), they are regulated by MiCA and do not require a MiFID license.
  • challenge:The decentralized nature of DeFi (such as the lack of a clear operating entity) makes it difficult to adapt to the centralized regulatory requirements of MiFID and may lead to a regulatory gray area.
  • solution: Clarify the platform’s functions, confirm applicable rules with the regulator (such as ESMA or member state regulators), and apply for MiFID or MiCA licenses if necessary.
  • The regulation of stablecoins depends on their structure:
    • Asset Reference Token (ART) or Electronic Money Token (EMT)(such as stablecoins pegged to fiat currencies or assets) are generally regulated by MiCA rather than MiFID II.
    • Securitized Stablecoins(e.g. representing debt or equity) may be considered financial instruments and subject to MiFID II regulation.
  • challenge:The hybrid nature of stablecoins (such as combining payment and investment functions) may lead to regulatory overlap.
  • solution: Analyze the legal attributes of stablecoins on a case-by-case basis to ensure compliance with MiFID II or MiCA requirements and confirm with regulators.
  • Most NFTs (such as digital art and collectibles) are not considered financial instruments for MiFID II because they are not fungible and do not have securities attributes and fall under MiCA or are not regulated. If the NFT represents a financial instrument (such as a demerged security interest), a MiFID license is required.
  • challenge: The regulatory classification of NFTs is unclear, especially regarding investment NFTs (such as real estate shares).
  • solution: Evaluate the functionality and rights of NFTs to ensure they do not violate MiFID II’s securities rules.
  • If virtual currencies are classified as financial instruments, MiFID II requires institutions to monitor market abuse (such as insider trading, price manipulation). The high volatility and anonymity of virtual currencies increase the difficulty of monitoring.
  • challenge: Decentralized exchanges (DEX) or over-the-counter (OTC) transactions may be difficult to track, and regulators may require additional monitoring measures.
  • solution: Deploy blockchain analysis tools such as Chainalysis to monitor trading patterns and ensure compliance with MiFID II’s Market Abuse Directive (MAR).
  • If virtual currency derivatives (such as crypto futures and options) are classified as financial instruments, MiFID II requires them to be traded on a regulated market (RM), MTF or OTF and cleared through a central clearing house (CCP).
  • challenge:Many crypto derivatives transactions are still conducted on unregulated platforms, and institutions need to adjust their operations to comply with MiFID II.
  • solution:Work with compliant trading venues to ensure that derivatives trading meets MiFID II and EMIR requirements.
  • MiFID licences are generally not directly transferable as they are tied to a specific legal entity and business model. If a company is acquired or restructured, it will need to apply to the regulator for change approval and reassess the compliance of the new entity.
  • challenge: Change review can be time-consuming and affect business continuity.
  • solution: Communicate with regulators (such as CySEC, FCA) in advance and prepare a detailed change plan.
  • If virtual currencies are financial instruments, their custody services must comply with MiFID II’s client asset protection rules (such as separation of client funds and regular reconciliation). Custody services for non-financial instruments are regulated by MiCA and require secure storage and disaster recovery mechanisms.
  • challenge:The security of virtual currency wallets (such as private key management and hacking risks) may raise regulatory concerns.
  • solution: Use multi-signature wallets, cold storage technology, and purchase insurance to reduce risks.
  • If an initial coin offering (ICO) or initial DEX offering (IDO) involves a security token, it is considered an offering of financial instruments regulated by MiFID II and is subject to underwriting and placement requirements. Non-securities ICO/IDO is regulated by MiCA and requires submission of a white paper and approval.
  • challenge: The global nature of crowdfunding may raise cross-border regulatory issues, and regulators may require additional disclosures.
  • solution: Clarify the attributes of tokens, ensure compliance with MiFID II or MiCA issuance requirements, and consult legal experts before operating in multiple countries.